Pakistan is suffering from one of the worst levels of smog in the world as Lahore has topped the most polluted city multiple times. The situation has reached a level that the government announced a Smog Emergency in Pakistan and has also started to talk about what has been termed as Smog Diplomacy to address the issue of stubble burning from Punjab, India. As such the government has also decided to implement a Green Lockdown but given the current economic crisis in the country this can negatively impact the livelihoods of multiple businesses. Furthermore, this might be short term measure but the policymakers need to work on clearing the smog-filled clouds for good. 

What is smog? Smog is a complex blend of particulate matter (PM2.5 and PM10), nitrogen oxides (NOx), sulfur dioxide (SO2), volatile organic compounds (VOCs), and other pollutants, whose concentrations are heavily influenced by local emissions sources, meteorological conditions, and atmospheric chemistry. A Green Lockdown—a generalized halt of economic activities—can reduce pollution temporarily by suspending emissions across various sectors, yet its indiscriminate nature does not address the dynamics of smog formation or the primary sources effectively. In contrast, well-targeted measures have the precision and technological backing to cut emissions where they matter most.

When we examine odd-even vehicle restrictions, they specifically address vehicular NOx emissions, which play a critical role in photochemical reactions leading to ozone and secondary particulate formation—both key smog components. Technical studies show that NOx contributes directly to the formation of PM2.5 through atmospheric reactions with ammonia, which is commonly present in agricultural areas like Punjab. By implementing odd-even restrictions, NOx emissions can be halved in high-traffic areas, which is significant given that transportation often accounts for more than 30% of urban NOx emissions. The vehicular sector also contributes substantial hydrocarbon emissions, which, when reduced, diminish the secondary reactions leading to ozone, a key component of smog. Hence, rather than broadly halting all vehicles through a Green Lockdown, an odd-even scheme provides targeted emissions reduction while maintaining essential transportation.

In terms of industrial emissions control, targeting high-pollution sources like brick kilns and coal-fired plants has a far more direct impact on particulate and SO2 levels. A technical breakdown shows that industrial sources contribute primarily to primary PM2.5 and secondary sulfates, formed when SO2 is oxidized in the atmosphere. Secondary sulfates are a significant component of haze and smog. By temporarily shutting down or reducing the operations of high-emission industries, regulators can dramatically lower the availability of SO2 in the atmosphere, thus interrupting the sulfate formation process. A Green Lockdown, while reducing industrial activity indiscriminately, lacks the precision to identify and control the worst offenders within the industrial sector. Targeted shutdowns allow for emission-intensive facilities to be directly impacted, resulting in more substantial and sustained reductions in ambient pollution.

The use of urban dust control measures, such as water sprinkling on construction sites and unpaved roads, is technically sound because it directly addresses particulate resuspension, a significant contributor to PM10. In urban settings, dust from construction and traffic can contribute up to 25% of airborne particulate matter. The mechanics of dust control are straightforward: wetting surfaces prevents dust from becoming airborne, which immediately lowers ambient PM10 levels. Studies demonstrate that regular water application reduces PM10 emissions by up to 60% in construction zones. Unlike a Green Lockdown, which would indiscriminately halt construction activities, targeted dust control measures allow essential work to continue while mitigating specific pollution sources. Moreover, PM10, being a coarser particulate matter, does not travel far; therefore, localized dust control has immediate and substantial effects on air quality within the impact area.

The approach of banning crop burning with the simultaneous provision of alternative solutions like Happy Seeders and in-situ management equipment is grounded in data on seasonal PM spikes in regions like Punjab. Crop residue burning releases enormous volumes of PM2.5 and CO, and it is an episodic yet high-impact activity, with emissions concentrated over a short timeframe. Targeting this specific source can prevent a seasonal surge in particulate matter, as was seen in California’s agricultural policies, where a combination of burn bans and subsidies for alternative residue management reduced particulate pollution by up to 30% during peak farming periods. This approach is technically superior to a Green Lockdown, which does not stop agricultural burning and, therefore, does not address this dominant contributor to smog. By enforcing a targeted ban and providing practical alternatives, policymakers address a primary smog source without impacting the broader economy.

Enforcing emission testing and penalizing high-emission vehicles can technically address both NOx and particulate pollution from older vehicles, which are disproportionately responsible for road-related emissions. Testing focuses on vehicles that emit above legal standards, removing these "super-emitters" from the roads. Data show that a small percentage of old, poorly maintained vehicles can contribute up to 50% of transportation-related PM emissions. Focusing on these vehicles is far more effective than a Green Lockdown in reducing transportation emissions, as it directly impacts high-pollution sources while allowing compliant vehicles to continue operating. This measure is supported by technology-driven emissions testing systems that quickly identify and mitigate excessive polluters, leading to an immediate, measurable improvement in air quality.

Lastly, traffic management and congestion reduction is a technically robust approach to minimizing emissions from idling and slow-moving vehicles. Studies indicate that idling engines emit high levels of CO, NOx, and PM. By improving traffic flow through real-time traffic management systems, synchronized signals, and no-idling zones, cities can reduce emissions from idling vehicles by up to 20%. A Green Lockdown, in comparison, broadly removes all vehicles regardless of necessity, while traffic management technologies can achieve a high reduction in emissions from congestion without halting economic activities or essential transportation.

Each of these alternatives has a strong technical foundation and is strategically targeted at primary pollution sources. In contrast, a Green Lockdown lacks this precision, functioning as a blunt tool that may provide temporary air quality relief but does not specifically disrupt the main contributors to smog formation. By focusing on sector-specific interventions, these targeted measures offer a scalable, efficient, and technically sound approach that not only yields immediate air quality improvements but also facilitates the kind of structural emissions reductions necessary for sustained progress.

illuminem Voices is a democratic space presenting the thoughts and opinions of leading Sustainability & Energy writers, their opinions do not necessarily represent those of illuminem.