Tariffs are breaking the one thing markets need to survive: Trust

It often begins with bold declarations - “We must protect our industries,” they say. “Our workers deserve better.” The public nods along. Tariffs, once again, are wielded as a political tool, dressed in the noble language of national interest and economic revival. But as always, beneath the surface of this populist packaging lies a complex ripple effect - one that is increasingly visible in the movement of government bond yields and the uneasy mood settling over financial markets.

The current tariff policies, driven largely by a cocktail of protectionism and geopolitical tension, are starting to deliver consequences beyond the intended borders of trade. They are distorting the very mechanism that signals economic health and future expectations: the government bond market. And yields - the silent but potent messengers of confidence, growth, and risk - are raising warnings we’d do well not to ignore.

When a government imposes tariffs, it does so with the intent of curbing imports and bolstering domestic production. The narrative is straightforward: protect local jobs, reduce dependency on foreign goods, and stimulate internal growth. But this seemingly self-contained action doesn't stay self-contained for long.

The globalised economy reacts. Retaliatory tariffs follow. Import prices rise. Supply chains adjust, often awkwardly and at great cost. Inflation expectations begin to climb - not from healthy demand, but from constrained supply and higher import costs. This artificial inflation - less a result of consumer exuberance and more of political engineering - forces central banks to weigh options. Should they hike interest rates to fight this inflation? Or should they hold, knowing the underlying growth is fragile?

Bond investors read between the lines, and the yield curve starts to speak

In the past six months, we’ve seen U.S. 10-year Treasury yields swing dramatically. The latest spike, pushing the yield north of 4.5%, wasn’t born out of robust economic growth. Rather, it came from a convergence of factors exacerbated by tariff-driven uncertainty. The fiscal position of the government - already under strain due to stimulus hangovers and infrastructure promises - worsens with declining trade revenues and slower global demand. Investors, sensing larger deficits and heavier issuance of government debt, demand higher yields to hold this risk.

At the short end of the curve, yields remain elevated due to persistent inflation prints. But at the long end, what should be a smooth ascent begins to flatten - and at times, invert. An inverted yield curve is often the market's polite way of yelling “recession ahead!” It reflects a belief that growth will slow, that the Fed (or any central bank) will eventually need to cut rates, and that the current inflation is not sustainable in the long term.

And herein lies the paradox: tariffs, while pitched as growth-enhancing tools, are helping engineer the very conditions that stifle growth.

It’s worth pausing on the fiscal implications of tariff policy. When tariffs disrupt trade and raise costs for consumers and businesses alike, the government doesn’t escape unscathed. Corporate profits take a hit, consumer spending contracts, and tax revenues falter. Meanwhile, entitlement spending continues its upward march, and interest payments on existing debt balloon due to rising yields.

To finance these obligations, the Treasury must issue more bonds. But here's the kicker - there's a dwindling pool of willing buyers. Foreign governments, traditionally large holders of U.S. debt, are becoming increasingly hesitant. China, in particular, has trimmed its holdings. Some of this may be politically motivated - a quiet retaliation to tariff threats. But much of it is practical. Why hold assets in a currency or under a regime that is wielding economic tools like blunt instruments?

As the demand for Treasuries falters, yields must rise to attract buyers. This further burdens the government's fiscal position, creating a feedback loop of higher borrowing costs and larger deficits. The bond market - normally a realm of quiet pragmatism - starts to look less like a safe haven and more like a pressure cooker.

The story doesn’t end at home. Tariff policies have global consequences. For emerging markets dependent on exports or closely tied to U.S. supply chains, the disruption spells trouble. Capital flees these economies in search of perceived safety, often in the form of U.S. Treasuries - ironically, even as those same instruments become riskier due to rising yields.

But when the yields rise too fast, even safe havens get shaky. Risk premiums rise across the board. Corporate bond spreads widen. Equity markets wobble. The cost of capital increases not just for governments, but for businesses and households. Investments are delayed. Hiring slows. The economy, rather than being protected, starts to contract.

In effect, tariffs don’t just tax imports - they tax confidence

What we’re witnessing is a classic case of policy contradiction. On one hand, governments pursue stimulus and spending to revive or sustain economic momentum. On the other, they impose tariffs that choke trade, increase inflation, and distort capital flows. The bond market, ever the realist in the room, adjusts accordingly. Yields rise not in celebration of growth, but in anticipation of risk.

We often forget that bond yields are not simply numbers. They are expressions of faith - or the lack thereof. Faith in fiscal prudence. Faith in institutional stability. Faith in the idea that today’s promises will be met tomorrow. When yields jump, it's not always because investors see better days ahead. Sometimes, it's because they fear what lies beneath the surface.

Tariffs make for powerful speeches. They rouse crowds, tap into nationalistic pride, and present an illusion of control in a turbulent world. But the bond market tells a different story - one where policy choices have consequences, where protectionism raises costs not just for others, but for ourselves.

We are entering an era where fiscal discipline, strategic trade alliances, and coherent economic messaging matter more than ever. If we continue down this path of disjointed policy - of tariff wars waged in the name of short-term wins - we may find that the real cost is not just in consumer prices or GDP figures.

The real cost may be in the quiet erosion of trust - trust in governments to manage their finances wisely, in central banks to remain apolitical, and in the idea that markets can still function free of fear and distortion.

And if trust breaks, no tariff will be enough to shield us from the storm that follows.

illuminem Voices is a democratic space presenting the thoughts and opinions of leading Sustainability & Energy writers, their opinions do not necessarily represent those of illuminem.