Sustainable development is a matter of market design

This article was originally published by​​ Project Syndicate

High-level SDG objectives need to be implemented at grassroots levels and with the right market structures and incentives.

Southeast Asia’s Malay Archipelago is very far away from Ukraine and the indigenous people of Borneo — living in some of the most pristine jungles left in the world — do not leave much of a carbon footprint. Yet even they cannot escape the effects of war, inflation and climate change.

And one of our best hopes of building a better world — the United Nations sustainable development goals — is looking increasingly unattainable.

The SDGs are supposed to “end poverty, protect the planet and ensure prosperity for all” by 2030. But the latest SDG report makes for grim reading. “Cascading and interlinked global crises” — including the COVID-19 pandemic, global warming, war, inflation and polarization — are jeopardizing the SDG agenda, having already reversed years of progress toward eradicating poverty and hunger.

Our recent visit to Borneo highlighted the consequences of these failures for indigenous people. Most of the 112,000 Murut people live in barely-developed rural areas in the island’s northern inland regions — mostly in Sabah, Malaysia — where goods and people used to move either by river or along gravel roads.

A generation ago — after living for centuries as hunter-gatherers, dependent on the forests — the Murut were persuaded to move to settlements and farm land they were given. But prices for their primary products — unprocessed rubber — have fallen, squeezing their incomes and they have neither the capital nor the knowhow to shift to more profitable crops, such as fruits or vegetables.

Improving the lot of Sabah’s indigenous population will require the development of business models that are both profitable and sustainable and enable communities to avoid excessive dependence on aid and subsidies. These models must be built on indigenous knowledge of local lands, ecosystems and be supported by investment in infrastructure and appropriate regulation.

But such support remains elusive, not least because indigenous people have limited options for making their voices heard. While they can cast ballots in periodic elections, vote-buying and patronage are rampant in Malaysia, so the interests of the economically powerful tend to come first. As a result, local knowledge and natural assets are not being leveraged to advance sustainable development.

This mirrors a broader challenge in achieving the SDGs. As a 2021 book edited by Jan Wouter Vasbinder and Jonathan Y.H. Sim showed, the world is not wanting for powerful technologies, funding, talent, or knowhow. The fact that these factors are not driving rapid progress toward the SDGs is a failure of governance — in particular, of market design.

Part of the problem is the lack of systems for matching the supply of technology, knowledge and funding with demand. In theory, the internet “flattens” access to information, knowhow and even finance. But rural indigenous people often do not have electricity, let alone internet access, so even where they have valuable expertise and ideas, their ability to get the support they need is severely limited.

The development of “smart villages” could help. Such villages would have access to high-quality services — water, energy, transport and connectivity — and be linked to smart cities. This would improve food security, spur ecotourism, foster entrepreneurship and enable innovative rural-urban partnerships in critical areas like adaptation to climate change.

Business can play a central role in developing such villages, under the mantle of corporate social responsibility. But they would still need a way to determine where to direct their resources to do the most good. This demands government-led efforts to design and implement a social-enterprise market.

The challenge is not limited to matching supply and demand. As China’s experience eradicating poverty shows, complex systems change requires top-down coordination and planning that accounts for — and responds to — bottom-up feedback. (This approach will be central to China’s own rural revitalization, including agricultural upgrading, land regeneration and expanded educational and employment opportunities.) As U.N. Secretary-General Antonio Guterres put it, achieving the SDGs will require global, local and people-level actions.

At the same time, government must “nudge” complex social systems into alignment with sustainable-development objectives, using tax and regulatory incentives. Regulation would certainly help address two other key challenges facing Borneo’s indigenous communities. First, palm-oil estates have eroded the forest cover and poisoned local waterways with pesticides and fertilizers, leaving rivers yellow with laterite soil erosion, unsafe for drinking and depleted of fish. And, second, the Pan-Borneo Highway that cuts through the jungle, while making transport easier, has disrupted local ecosystems and spurred young people to leave in search of jobs.

High-level objectives like the SDGs cannot be achieved with rigid, one-dimensional approaches. Instead, they must be translated into well-coordinated, concrete initiatives that can be implemented and adapted at the grassroots level. This will be possible only with the right market structures and incentives, overseen by a genuinely responsive regulatory apparatus.

Copyright: Project Syndicate, 2022. This article is also published on Project Syndicate. Illuminem Voices is a democratic space presenting the thoughts and opinions of leading Sustainability & Energy writers, their opinions do not necessarily represent those of illuminem.